ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019
The patient experience of ambulatory cancer treatment: a descriptive study.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comorbidity, treatment toxicity and satisfaction with cancer care: an international cross-sectional study based on the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring the Determinants of Patient Experiences Using the Digital Topic Modeling Approach.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Spinal Cord Tumors Among Patients and Their Families in Beijing: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Age Analysis of the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey: Differences in Satisfaction across Dimensions of Person-Centred Care and Unmet Needs among Older Adults Receiving Cancer Treatment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- A qualitative analysis of free-text patient satisfaction responses in Care Response, a database of patient-reported outcome and experience measures.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2024Article
- Quantifying the Impact of Family Doctors on the Care Experiences of Patients with Cancer: Exploring Evidence from the 2021 Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey in Alberta, Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- The Impact of Patient Experience on Loyalty in the Context of Medical-Aesthetic Health Services.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- Cancer Survivors in Saint Lucia Deeply Value Social Support: Considerations for Cancer Control in Under-Resourced Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patients' cancer care perceptions conceptualized through the Cancer Experience Measurement Framework.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- Comparison of Patient-Reported Experience of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy Measured by Two Validated Surveys.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text comments in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Assessment of Parking Fees at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Treatment Centers.JAMA oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient experience is often measured quantitatively, but that approach has limitations for understanding the entire experience. Qualitative methods can help to understand more complex issues most important to patients and their families. The purpose of the present work was to use a qualitative analysis examining the patient experience of ambulatory cancer care in Ontario to generate a deeper understanding of the patient experience and to lead to solutions for improvement. Methods: Data from the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (aopss) for 2013-2015 were used to conduct a qualitative content analysis. The aopss is a retrospective paper-based survey, mailed to patients who are currently receiving cancer treatment or who have received cancer treatment within the preceding 6 months, that is designed to capture their experiences. Patients who were surveyed were asked, "Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your cancer care services?" The National Research Corporation Canada's patient-centred care framework was used to guide the analysis. Results: From the 5391 patients who responded, 7328 coded responses were generated, of which 3658 (49.9%) were related to the patient-centred care framework. New subthemes were identified: diagnosis sensitivity; emotional support resources; care delivery with care, compassion, and comfort; continuity of care between departments and in the community; access to cancer centre personnel; patient-health care provider communication; confidence in the health care provider; wait times; health care provider and treatment coordination; and parking. Conclusions: The results identify facilitators and barriers to the patient experience in the ambulatory cancer treatment setting from the patient perspective and identify opportunities to improve the patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.