ArticleJournal of transport geography2019
Freedom from the Station: Spatial Equity in Access to Dockless Bike Share.
Article in Journal of transport geography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared micromobility, perceived accessibility, and social capital.Transportation · 2026Article
- The escalating burden of cyclist road injuries among reproductive-aged women in china: a longitudinal and gender-specific analysis of the global burden of disease study 1990-2021.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Global comparison of urban bike-sharing accessibility across 40 cities.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Uncovering the spatio-temporal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shared e-scooter usage: A spatial panel model.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2023Article
- The effects of COVID-19 on female and male bike sharing users: Insights from Lisbon'sCities (London, England) · 2023Article
- Correlates of bike share use and its association with weight status at an urban university.PloS one · 2022Article
- Integrative urban AI to expand coverage, access, and equity of urban data.The European physical journal. Special topics · 2022Article
- Prediction for Origin-Destination Distribution of Dockless Shared Bicycles: A Case Study in Nanjing City.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Who is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021Review
- Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Understanding the Shared E-scooter Travels in Austin, TX.ISPRS international journal of geo-information · 2020Article
- Evaluation of free-floating bike-share on a university campus using a multi-method approach.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- Free-Floating Bikeshare and Helmet Use in Seattle, WA.Journal of community health · 2019Article
- Roadmap for free-floating bikeshare research and practice in North America.Transport reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBike sharing systems have potential to substantially boost active transportation levels (and consequent physical and mental health) in urban populations. We explored equity of spatial access in a novel 'dockless' bike share system that does not that constrain bike pickup and drop-off locations to docking stations.
methodsStarting in July 2017, Seattle, Washington piloted a dockless bike share system that made 10,000 bikes available. We merged data on resident sociodemographic and economic characteristics from the American Community Survey about 93 defined neighborhoods with data about bike locations, bike idle time, and which neighborhoods operators rebalanced bikes to. We used mapping and descriptive statistics to compare access between neighborhoods along sociodemographic and economic lines.
resultsWith many bikes available, no neighborhood was consistently excluded from access. However, the average availability ranged from 3 bikes per day to 341 per day. Neighborhoods with more bikes had more college-educated residents (median 75% college-educated vs. 65%) and local community resources (median opportunity index score of 24 vs. 19), and higher incomes (median 83,202 vs. 71,296). Rebalancing destinations were strongly correlated with neighborhood demand (r=0.61).
conclusionsThe overall scale of the dockless system ensured there was baseline access throughout Seattle. We observed modest inequities in access along sociodemographic lines, similar to prior findings in studies of docked bike share systems. Dockless bike share systems hold promise for offering equitable spatial access to bike sharing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.