Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548731›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2019

Landmarks in vaginal mesh development: polypropylene mesh for treatment of SUI and POP.

Naşide Mangir, Betül Aldemir Dikici, Christopher R Chapple, Sheila MacNeil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. ComparativeBiomacromolecules · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Time for women-centred gynaecology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naşide MangirKroto Research Institute, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Betül Aldemir DikiciKroto Research Institute, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Christopher R ChappleRoyal Hallamshire Hospital, Department of Urology, Sheffield, UK.
Sheila MacNeilKroto Research Institute, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. s.macneil@sheffield.ac.uk.
University of Sheffield · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal meshes used in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have produced highly variable outcomes, causing life-changing complications in some patients while providing others with effective, minimally invasive treatments. The risk:benefit ratio when using vaginal meshes is a complex issue in which a combination of several factors, including the inherent incompatibility of the mesh material with some applications in pelvic reconstructive surgeries and the lack of appropriate regulatory approval processes at the time of the premarket clearance of these products, have contributed to the occurrence of complications caused by vaginal mesh. Surgical mesh used in hernia repair has evolved over many years, from metal implants to knitted polymer meshes that were adopted for use in the pelvic floor for treatment of POP and SUI. The evolution of the material and textile properties of the surgical mesh was guided by clinical feedback from hernia repair procedures, which were also being modified to obtain the best outcomes with use of the mesh. Current evidence shows how surgical mesh fails biomechanically when used in the pelvic floor and materials with improved performance can be developed using modern material processing and tissue engineering techniques.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignPolypropylenesSurgical MeshFemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary Incontinence, StressVaginaPolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID31548731
OpenAlexW2974483100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.