Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548707›Full record

ReviewNature methods2019

Brillouin microscopy: an emerging tool for mechanobiology.

Robert Prevedel, Alba Diz-Muñoz, Giancarlo Ruocco, Giuseppe Antonacci

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 228 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanical control in dental and jaw morphogenesis and remodeling.International journal of oral science · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert PrevedelCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. prevedel@embl.de.
Alba Diz-MuñozCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. diz@embl.de.
Giancarlo RuoccoCenter for Life Nano Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe AntonacciCenter for Life Nano Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role and importance of mechanical properties of cells and tissues in cellular function, development and disease has widely been acknowledged, however standard techniques currently used to assess them exhibit intrinsic limitations. Recently, Brillouin microscopy, a type of optical elastography, has emerged as a non-destructive, label- and contact-free method that can probe the viscoelastic properties of biological samples with diffraction-limited resolution in 3D. This led to increased attention amongst the biological and medical research communities, but it also sparked debates about the interpretation and relevance of the measured physical quantities. Here, we review this emerging technology by describing the underlying biophysical principles and discussing the interpretation of Brillouin spectra arising from heterogeneous biological matter. We further elaborate on the technique's limitations, as well as its potential for gaining insights in biology, in order to guide interested researchers from various fields.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysicsHumansMicroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.