ArticleJournal of human hypertension2020
The relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque: a cohort study in China.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Intima-Media Thickness Measured at the Common Carotid Artery With Incident Carotid Plaque: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of 20 Prospective Studies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Carotid intima-media thickness predicts carotid plaque development: Meta-analysis of seven studies involving 9341 participants.European journal of clinical investigation · 2020Pooled it
- Damage Burden in Polish Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome Measured Using Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS).Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Determinants of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with asymptomatic unstable plaques: a population-based cross-sectional study in rural China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Value of carotid intima thickness in assessing advanced carotid plaque vulnerability: a study based on carotid artery ultrasonography and carotid plaque histology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque (CP) quantified by B-mode ultrasound have been proposed as surrogate imaging biomarkers of subclinical atherosclerosis, while the relationship between cIMT and CP, whether cIMT evaluation in a given patient might allow for predicting the development of a carotid plaque, is still discussed controversially. We investigated the cross-sectional relationship between cIMT and CP, and the predictive value of cIMT for incident CP formation in 1078 subjects with mean age of 52 ± 5 years in a community based atherosclerosis cohort in Beijing. Participants underwent ultrasonography of bilateral carotid arteries and received vascular risk factor assessment at baseline and after a mean of 2.35 years follow-up. The prevalence of plaque was increased by 3.75-fold for upper quartile cIMT compare with the lower quartile even after adjustments for traditional risk factors at baseline. Among the 746 plaque-free subjects at baseline, 230 (31.0%) developed new CP. After adjusted for demographics and vascular risk factors, neither baseline cIMT nor the cIMT change from baseline to follow-up predicted incident CP. In conclusion, although cIMT associates with CP cross-sectionally, increased cIMT dose not independently predict future plaque development. Our data suggest that paying attention to the traditional risk factors might prevent subjects from developing carotid plaques regardless from IMT changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.