Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548597›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Various modes of action of dietary phytochemicals, sulforaphane and phenethyl isothiocyanate, on pathogenic bacteria.

Dariusz Nowicki, Monika Maciąg-Dorszyńska, Krystyna Bogucka, Agnieszka Szalewska-Pałasz, Anna Herman-Antosiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ISME communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Phytochemicals Controlling EnterohemorrhagicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Isothiocyanate-rich moringa seed extract reduces skin inflammation in mouse ear edema model.Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Synergistic Microbicidal Effect of AUR and PEITC AgainstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Transcriptomic Reprograming ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dariusz NowickiDepartment of Bacterial Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland.
Monika Maciąg-DorszyńskaDepartment of Bacterial Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland.
Krystyna BoguckaDepartment of Bacterial Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland.
Agnieszka Szalewska-PałaszDepartment of Bacterial Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland. agnieszka.szalewska-palasz@biol.ug.edu.pl.
Anna Herman-AntosiewiczDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland. anna.herman-antosiewicz@biol.ug.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-2168
University of Gdańsk · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isothiocyanates (ITCs) derived from cruciferous plants reveal antibacterial activity, although detailed mechanism is not fully elucidated. Recently it has been reported that ITCs induce the stringent response in Escherichia coli strains. The aim of this work was to determine whether two isothiocyanates, sulforaphane (SFN) and phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), similarly as in E. coli induce stringent response in Bacillus subtilis, model Gram(+) bacterium, and test their potency against a panel of clinical isolates belonging to Gram(+) or Gram(-) groups. Minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined as well as effect of ITCs on membranes integrity, synthesis of DNA, RNA and stringent response alarmones was assessed. SFN and PEITC are effective against B. subtilis and bacterial isolates, namely E. coli, K. pneumonia, S. aureus, S. epidermidis and E. faecalis. Interestingly, in B. subtilis and E. faecalis the inhibition of growth and nucleic acids synthesis is independent of ppGpp accumulation. In bacteria, which do not induce the stringent response in the presence of ITCs, membrane integrity disruption is observed. Thus, ITCs are effective against different pathogenic bacteria and act by at least two mechanisms depending on bacteria species.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisEscherichia coliIsothiocyanatesKlebsiella pneumoniaePhytochemicalsStaphylococcus aureusSulfoxidesIsothiocyanatesphenethyl isothiocyanatePhytochemicalssulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID31548597
PMCPMC6757042
OpenAlexW2974361967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.