ArticleScientific reports2019
The microbial community in filamentous bulking sludge with the ultra-low sludge loading and long sludge retention time in oxidation ditch.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lotka-Volterra dynamics facilitate sustainable biocontrol of wastewater sludge bulking.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Bacterial community and filamentous population of industrial wastewater treatment plants in Belgium.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Assembly of 97 Novel Bacterial Genomes in the Microbial Community Affiliated with Polyvinyl Alcohol in Soil of Northern China.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- A novel freshwater cyanophage vB_MelS-Me-ZS1 infecting bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis elabens.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sludge bulking is a major problem that restricts the development of the activated sludge process. The microbial community responsible for sludge bulking varies depending on water quality and operational conditions. This study analysed the microbial community of bulking sludge in oxidation ditch with ultra-low sludge loading and long sludge retention time using high-throughput sequencing. The study found that the relative abundance of bacterial genus Saprospiraceae_norank was the highest in bulking sludge, reaching 13.39-28.83%, followed by Comamonadaceae_unclassified, Ardenticatenia_norank and Tetrasphaera, with the relative abundance of 4.59-11.08%, 0.52-16.60% and 0.17-8.92% respectively. In contrast, the relative abundance of bacteria that easily caused sludge bulking including Microthrix (0.54-2.47%), Trichococcus (0.32-1.71%), Gordonia (0.14-1.28%), and Thiothrix (0.01-0.06%) were relatively low. Saprospiraceae_norank was predominant and induced sludge bulking in oxidation ditch. The relative abundance of fungal genus Trichosporon was the highest in bulking sludge, reaching 16.95-24.98%, while other fungal genera were Saccharomycetales_unclassified (5.59-14.55%), Ascomycota_norank (1.45-13.51%), Galactomyces (5.23-11.23%), and Debaryomyces (7.69-9.42%), whereas Trichosporon was the dominant fungal genus in bulking sludge. This study reported that excessive Saprospiraceae_norank can induce sludge bulking for the first time, which provides important knowledge to control sludge bulking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.