Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548427›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups.

Matthew M G Sosna, Colin R Twomey, Joseph Bak-Coleman, Winnie Poel, Bryan C Daniels, Pawel Romanczuk, Iain D Couzin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The fruit fly,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparing cooperative geometric puzzle solving in ants versus humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Collective phase transitions in confined fish schools.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding collective behavior through neurobiology.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Selective social interactions and speed-induced leadership in schooling fish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Collective behavior from surprise minimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Federated inference and belief sharing.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Wild animals suppress the spread of socially transmitted misinformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Low-distortion information propagation with noise suppression in swarm networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Mitochondrial signal transduction.Cell metabolism · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew M G SosnaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; matt.g.sosna@gmail.com icouzin@ab.mpg.de.
Colin R TwomeyDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Joseph Bak-ColemanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-7590-3824
Winnie PoelInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.
Bryan C DanielsArizona State University-Santa Fe Institute (ASU-SFI) Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-1059
Pawel RomanczukInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-998X
Iain D CouzinDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, D-78547 Konstanz, Germany; matt.g.sosna@gmail.com icouzin@ab.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8556-4558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need to make fast decisions under risky and uncertain conditions is a widespread problem in the natural world. While there has been extensive work on how individual organisms dynamically modify their behavior to respond appropriately to changing environmental conditions (and how this is encoded in the brain), we know remarkably little about the corresponding aspects of collective information processing in animal groups. For example, many groups appear to show increased "sensitivity" in the presence of perceived threat, as evidenced by the increased frequency and magnitude of repeated cascading waves of behavioral change often observed in fish schools and bird flocks under such circumstances. How such context-dependent changes in collective sensitivity are mediated, however, is unknown. Here we address this question using schooling fish as a model system, focusing on 2 nonexclusive hypotheses: 1) that changes in collective responsiveness result from changes in how individuals respond to social cues (i.e., changes to the properties of the "nodes" in the social network), and 2) that they result from changes made to the structural connectivity of the network itself (i.e., the computation is encoded in the "edges" of the network). We find that despite the fact that perceived risk increases the probability for individuals to initiate an alarm, the context-dependent change in collective sensitivity predominantly results not from changes in how individuals respond to social cues, but instead from how individuals modify the spatial structure, and correspondingly the topology of the network of interactions, within the group. Risk is thus encoded as a collective property, emphasizing that in group-living species individual fitness can depend strongly on coupling between scales of behavioral organization.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationGroup ProcessesPopulation DynamicsSocial BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDecision MakingFishesModels, BiologicalReflex, Startleantipredator behaviorgroup structuresocial contagion

Identifiers

PMID31548427
PMCPMC6789631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.