Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548402›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Future epidemiological and economic impacts of universal influenza vaccines.

Pratha Sah, Jorge A Alfaro-Murillo, Meagan C Fitzpatrick, Kathleen M Neuzil, Lauren A Meyers, Burton H Singer, Alison P Galvani

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitatively Mapping Immune Control during Influenza.Current opinion in systems biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Message in a bottle: mRNA vaccination for influenza.The Journal of general virology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pratha SahCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520.
Jorge A Alfaro-MurilloCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520.
Meagan C FitzpatrickCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520.
Kathleen M NeuzilCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Lauren A MeyersDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Burton H SingerEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610 bhsinger@epi.ufl.edu.
Alison P GalvaniCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520.
Yale University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Impacts of Individual and Social Behavior on Influenza Dynamics and ControlU01GM087719 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GALVANI, ALISON P, MEYERS, LAUREN ANCEL · 2009 to 2018
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM087719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of influenza vaccines, currently at 44%, is limited by the rapid antigenic evolution of the virus and a manufacturing process that can lead to vaccine mismatch. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) recently identified the development of a universal influenza vaccine with an efficacy of at least 75% as a high scientific priority. The US Congress approved $130 million funding for the 2019 fiscal year to support the development of a universal vaccine, and another $1 billion over 5 y has been proposed in the Flu Vaccine Act. Using a model of influenza transmission, we evaluated the population-level impacts of universal influenza vaccines distributed according to empirical age-specific coverage at multiple scales in the United States. We estimate that replacing just 10% of typical seasonal vaccines with 75% efficacious universal vaccines would avert ∼5.3 million cases, 81,000 hospitalizations, and 6,300 influenza-related deaths per year. This would prevent over $1.1 billion in direct health care costs compared to a typical season, based on average data from the 2010-11 to 2018-19 seasons. A complete replacement of seasonal vaccines with universal vaccines is projected to prevent 17 million cases, 251,000 hospitalizations, 19,500 deaths, and $3.5 billion in direct health care costs. States with high per-hospitalization medical expenses along with a large proportion of elderly residents are expected to receive the maximum economic benefit. Replacing even a fraction of seasonal vaccines with universal vaccines justifies the substantial cost of vaccine development.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleInfluenza Vaccinesmathematical modelmedical costseasonal vaccine

Identifiers

PMID31548402
PMCPMC6789917
OpenAlexW2975746568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.