Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548385›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Propinquity drives the emergence of network structure and density.

Lazaros K Gallos, Shlomo Havlin, H Eugene Stanley, Nina H Fefferman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the friendship paradox and inversity: A network property with applications to privacy-sensitive network interventions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lazaros K GallosCenter for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (DIMACS), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854; lgallos@gmail.com hes@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2713-7934
Shlomo HavlinDepartment of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel.
H Eugene StanleyPhysics Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215; lgallos@gmail.com hes@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2800-4495
Nina H FeffermanDepartment of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of large-scale, continuously evolving empirical data usually limits the study of networks to the analysis of snapshots in time. This approach has been used for verification of network evolution mechanisms, such as preferential attachment. However, these studies are mostly restricted to the analysis of the first links established by a new node in the network and typically ignore connections made after each node's initial introduction. Here, we show that the subsequent actions of individuals, such as their second network link, are not random and can be decoupled from the mechanism behind the first network link. We show that this feature has strong influence on the network topology. Moreover, snapshots in time can now provide information on the mechanism used to establish the second connection. We interpret these empirical results by introducing the "propinquity model," in which we control and vary the distance of the second link established by a new node and find that this can lead to networks with tunable density scaling, as found in real networks. Our work shows that sociologically meaningful mechanisms are influencing network evolution and provides indications of the importance of measuring the distance between successive connections.

Indexed as

network densitynetwork evolutionnetwork generation methods

Identifiers

PMID31548385
PMCPMC6789902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.