Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548357›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

Fitness benefits of loss of heterozygosity in

Samuel M Lancaster, Celia Payen, Caiti Smukowski Heil, Maitreya J Dunham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Loss of Heterozygosity and Its Importance in Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. JLOH: Inferring loss of heterozygosity blocks from sequencing data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel M LancasterDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Celia PayenDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3717-5579
Caiti Smukowski HeilDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2864-1315
Maitreya J DunhamDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-2666
University of Washington · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With two genomes in the same organism, interspecific hybrids have unique fitness opportunities and costs. In both plants and yeasts, wild, pathogenic, and domesticated hybrids may eliminate portions of one parental genome, a phenomenon known as loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Laboratory evolution of hybrid yeast recapitulates these results, with LOH occurring in just a few hundred generations of propagation. In this study, we systematically looked for alleles that are beneficial when lost in order to determine how prevalent this mode of adaptation may be and to determine candidate loci that might underlie the benefits of larger-scale chromosome rearrangements. These aims were accomplished by mating

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessGenome, FungalHybridization, GeneticLoss of HeterozygositySaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID31548357
PMCPMC6771408
OpenAlexW2974934997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.