Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547858›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Ki67 index in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and its association with prognostic parameters.

Atif Ali Hashmi, Kashif Ali Hashmi, Muhammad Irfan, Saadia Mehmood Khan, Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi, Javaria Parwez Ali, Shumaila Kanwal Hashmi, Huda Asif, Naveen Faridi, Amir Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers in breast cancer 2024: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Atif Ali HashmiLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kashif Ali HashmiNishtar Medical College Hospital, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad IrfanLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saadia Mehmood KhanLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Muzzammil EdhiBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Javaria Parwez AliLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shumaila Kanwal HashmiCMH Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan.
Huda AsifCMH Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan.
Naveen FaridiLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Amir KhanKandahar University, Kandahar, 3802, Afghanistan. dramirkhan04@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-7690
Liaquat National Hospital · PKNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PKBrown University · USKandahar University · AF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesKi67 is the most commonly used marker to evaluate proliferative index in breast cancer, however no cutoff values have been clearly defined for high ki67 index. Cancer management should be according to loco-regional profile; therefore, we aimed to determine ki67 index in 1951 cases of intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and its association with other prognostic parameters in our set up.

resultsTriple negative breast cancers showed highest ki67 index (mean 50.9 ± 23.7%) followed by Her2neu (mean 42.6 ± 21.6%) and luminal B cancers (mean 34.9 ± 20.05%). Metaplastic and medullary breast cancers significantly showed higher ki67 index as compared to ductal carcinoma, NOS. No significant association of ki67 index was noted with any of the histologic parameters in different subtypes of breast cancer expect for tumor grade. Although, ki67 index is a valuable biomarker in breast cancer, however no independent prognostic significance of ki67 could be established in our study.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast Carcinoma In SituBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, MedullaryDiagnosis, DifferentialErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene ExpressionHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenBreast cancerERHer2neuIntrinsic subtypes of breast cancerKi67 indexPR

Identifiers

PMID31547858
PMCPMC6755684
OpenAlexW2975043198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.