Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547851›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Bacterial contamination and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of intensive care units medical equipment and inanimate surfaces at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia.

Addis Darge, Atsebaha Gebrekidan Kahsay, Haftamu Hailekiros, Selam Niguse, Mahmud Abdulkader

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Impact of Hydrogen Peroxide (HJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gram-Negative Rods on Inanimate Surfaces of Selected Hospital Facilities and Their Nosocomial Significance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Methicillin-ResistantThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Addis DargeMedical Laboratory Technology Department, Bahirdar College of Health Sciences, Bahidar, Ethiopia.
Atsebaha Gebrekidan KahsayMedical Microbiology and Immunology Unit, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, PO. Box: 1871, Mekelle, Ethiopia. atseba_mu@yahoo.com.
Haftamu HailekirosMedical Microbiology and Immunology Unit, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, PO. Box: 1871, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Selam NiguseMedical Microbiology and Immunology Unit, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, PO. Box: 1871, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Mahmud AbdulkaderMedical Microbiology and Immunology Unit, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, PO. Box: 1871, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Mekelle University · ETBahir Dar University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine bacterial contaminants and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from medical equipment and inanimate surfaces.

resultsOf 130 swabs, 115 (88.5%) swabs were culture positive, of which contaminated medical equipment and inanimate surfaces account 70 (83.3%) and 45 (97.8%), respectively. All the swabs collected from sphygmomanometer, bedside table, computer and computer standing tables were 100% contaminated with bacteria. From the culture-positive swabs, a total of 171 bacterial isolates were identified, out of which 117 (68.4%) and 54 (31.6%) isolates were gram-positive and gram-negative, respectively. Most isolates (82%) were resistant to ampicillin and 13%, 8.6%, and 14% was observed in ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline respectively. Multi-drug resistant was observed in Escherichia coli (72.7%) and Staphylococcus aureus (58.7%).

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment ContaminationEscherichia coliEthiopiaFomitesGentamicinsHospitals, SpecialHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusTetracyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinGentamicinsTetracyclineAntimicrobial susceptibility patternBacterial contaminationEthiopiaInanimate surfacesMedical equipment

Identifiers

PMID31547851
PMCPMC6757422
OpenAlexW2975597236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.