Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547732›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2020

Early experience and technical aspects of physician-modified fenestration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch pathologies.

Xin Li, Quanming Li, Weichang Zhang, Ming Li, Hao He, Mingyao Luo, Kun Fang, Chenzi Yang, Jieting Zhu, Chang Shu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Animal study on adjustable preZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xin LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Quanming LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Weichang ZhangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hao HeDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Mingyao LuoState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kun FangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chenzi YangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jieting ZhuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chang ShuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Secondary Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-2218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was performed to describe the treatment of aortic arch pathologies with a physician-modified fenestration (PMF) technique in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

methodsFrom August 2015 to August 2017, 32 patients with aortic arch pathologies underwent TEVAR with the PMF technique. All patients' clinical data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 7.0.

resultsThirty-four aortic stent-grafts were implanted in 32 patients. The mean proximal diameter of the stent-graft was 32.4 ± 3.4 cm, and the mean length was 170.0 ± 25.2 cm. Twenty-nine PMF procedures were performed to preserve the left subclavian artery (LSA) and three to preserve both the LSA and left common carotid artery. The mean distance between the pathology and LSA was 8.4 ± 4.0 mm. The mean procedure time (from first to last digital subtraction angiography) was 22.8 ± 20.8 min. The mean follow-up time was 8.3 ± 5.3 months. During follow-up, the all-cause survival rate was 83.3% and the patency rate of the branch artery after PMF was 96.0%.

conclusionThe PMF technique is a relatively safe, feasible, and time-saving method to preserve the branch artery in TEVAR for aortic arch pathologies. The short- to middle-term result of this technique is satisfactory.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresPhysiciansAorta, ThoracicBlood Vessel ProsthesisHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeaortic arch pathologiesendovascular techniqueleft common carotid arteryleft subclavian arteryphysician-modified fenestrationstent-graftThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)

Identifiers

PMID31547732
PMCPMC7607183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.