Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547632›Full record

ReviewVaccines2019

Current Progress of Avian Vaccines Against West Nile Virus.

Nereida Jiménez de Oya, Estela Escribano-Romero, Ana-Belén Blázquez, Miguel A Martín-Acebes, Juan-Carlos Saiz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Animal and Human Vaccines against West Nile Virus.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Potential for Protein Kinase Pharmacological Regulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Immune responses and protective effects against Japanese encephalitis induced by a DNA vaccine encoding the prM/E proteins of the attenuated SA14-14-2 strain.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nereida Jiménez de OyaDepartment of Biotechnology, National Agricultural and Food Research and Technology Institute (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain. jdeoya@inia.es.
Estela Escribano-RomeroDepartment of Biotechnology, National Agricultural and Food Research and Technology Institute (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain. eescribano@inia.es.
Ana-Belén BlázquezDepartment of Biotechnology, National Agricultural and Food Research and Technology Institute (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain. blazquez@inia.es.
Miguel A Martín-AcebesDepartment of Biotechnology, National Agricultural and Food Research and Technology Institute (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain. martin.mangel@inia.es.
Juan-Carlos SaizDepartment of Biotechnology, National Agricultural and Food Research and Technology Institute (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain. jcsaiz@inia.es.
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ES

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid S2018/BAA-4370 (PLATESA2-CM)Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RTA-2015-00009-00-00 and E-RTA-2017-00003-C02-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds are the main natural host of West Nile virus (WNV), the worldwide most distributed mosquito-borne flavivirus, but humans and equids can also be sporadic hosts. Many avian species have been reported as susceptible to WNV, particularly corvids. In the case that clinical disease develops in birds, this is due to virus invasion of different organs: liver, spleen, kidney, heart, and mainly the central nervous system, which can lead to death 24-48 h later. Nowadays, vaccines have only been licensed for use in equids; thus, the availability of avian vaccines would benefit bird populations, both domestic and wild ones. Such vaccines could be used in endangered species housed in rehabilitation and wildlife reserves, and in animals located at zoos and other recreational installations, but also in farm birds, and in those that are grown for hunting and restocking activities. Even more, controlling WNV infection in birds can also be useful to prevent its spread and limit outbreaks. So far, different commercial and experimental vaccines (inactivated, attenuated, and recombinant viruses, and subunits and DNA-based candidates) have been evaluated, with various regimens, both in domestic and wild avian species. However, there are still disadvantages that must be overcome before avian vaccination can be implemented, such as its cost-effectiveness for domestic birds since in many species the pathogenicity is low or zero, or the viability of being able to achieve collective immunity in wild birds in freedom. Here, a comprehensive review of what has been done until now in the field of avian vaccines against WNV is presented and discussed.

Indexed as

birdsflavivirusherd immunityvaccinesWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID31547632
PMCPMC6963603
OpenAlexW2975002866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.