Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547532›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Current Possibilities of Gynecologic Cancer Treatment with the Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Ewelina Grywalska, Małgorzata Sobstyl, Lechosław Putowski, Jacek Roliński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewelina GrywalskaDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Immunotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodzki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland. ewelina.grywalska@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-4741
Małgorzata SobstylChair and Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 23 (SPSW), 20-037 Lublin, Poland. sobma@poczta.onet.pl.
Lechosław PutowskiChair and Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 23 (SPSW), 20-037 Lublin, Poland. putowskil@yahoo.com.
Jacek RolińskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Immunotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodzki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland. jacek.rolinski@gmail.com.

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie 460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ongoing progress in cancer research, the global cancer burden has increased to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths in 2018. Gynecological cancers, such as ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, considerably contribute to global cancer burden, leading to $5,862.6, $2,945.7, and $1,543.9 million of annual costs of cancer care, respectively. Thus, the development of effective therapies against gynecological cancers is still a largely unmet medical need. One of the novel therapeutic approaches is to induce anti-cancer immunity by the inhibition of the immune checkpoint pathways using monoclonal antibodies. The molecular targets for monoclonal antibodies are cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). The rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with gynecological cancers was based on the immunohistological studies showing high expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in those cancers. Currently available immune checkpoint inhibitors include nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and ipilimumab. The efficacy and safety of these inhibitors, used as monotherapy and with combination with chemotherapy, is being currently evaluated in several clinical studies. As the results are promising, more clinical trials are being planned, which may lead to the development of efficient therapies for gynecological cancer patients.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleNeoplasm ProteinsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNeoplasm Proteinscytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4endometrial cancerovarian cancerprogrammed cell death protein 1T cell exhaustion

Identifiers

PMID31547532
PMCPMC6801535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.