ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Directed Evolution of
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thermostable Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes for High-Temperature Biomass Conversion: From Molecular Design to Process Integration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular approaches for enhancing fermented bamboo-derived feed additives: A sustainable nutritional innovation for poultry.Poultry science · 2025Review
- Lignocellulose degradation in bacteria and fungi: cellulosomes and industrial relevance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Enzymes for Biomass Pretreatment: A Comprehensive Review.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in β-Glucosidase Sequence and Structure Engineering: A Brief Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Engineering cellulases for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2023Review
- A Review of Advanced Molecular Engineering Approaches to Enhance the Thermostability of Enzyme Breakers: From Prospective of Upstream Oil and Gas Industry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Comparative genomics reveals cellobiose hydrolysis mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Innovations in CAZyme gene diversity and its modification for biorefinery applications.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Review
- Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes: Structure, Activity, and Reaction Products.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Engineering Robust Cellulases for Tailored Lignocellulosic Degradation Cocktails.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Progress in Ameliorating Beneficial Characteristics of Microbial Cellulases by Genetic Engineering Approaches for Cellulose Saccharification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
β-Glucosidases are key enzymes in the process of cellulose utilization. It is the last enzyme in the cellulose hydrolysis chain, which converts cellobiose to glucose. Since cellobiose is known to have a feedback inhibitory effect on a variety of cellulases, β-glucosidase can prevent this inhibition by hydrolyzing cellobiose to non-inhibitory glucose. While the optimal temperature of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.