Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547471›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Kinase Inhibitors and Ovarian Cancer.

Periklis Katopodis, Dimple Chudasama, Gurleen Wander, Louise Sales, Juhi Kumar, Manreen Pandhal, Vladimir Anikin, Jayanta Chatterjee, Marcia Hall, Emmanouil Karteris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for ovarian cancer treatment: from organic to inorganic chemotherapeutics towards selectivity-a perspective overview.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Periklis KatopodisBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. periklis.katopodis@brunel.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8892-2768
Dimple ChudasamaBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. dimpz22@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9063-0193
Gurleen WanderChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London UB9 6JH, UK. gurleenwander@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5360-580X
Louise SalesBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. 1507909@brunel.ac.uk.
Juhi KumarBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. juhi.kumar@brunel.ac.uk.
Manreen PandhalBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. 1306204@alumni.brunel.ac.uk.
Vladimir AnikinDivision of Thoracic Surgery, The Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, London UB9 6JH, UK. v.anikin@rbht.nhs.uk.
Jayanta ChatterjeeFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK. jayanta.chatterjee1@nhs.net.
Marcia HallBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. marcia.hall@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-0039-5041
Emmanouil KarterisBiosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. emmanouil.karteris@brunel.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is fifth in the rankings of cancer deaths among women, and accounts for more deaths than any other gynecological malignancy. Despite some improvement in overall-(OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following surgery and first-line chemotherapy, there is a need for development of novel and more effective therapeutic strategies. In this mini review, we provide a summary of the current landscape of the clinical use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Emerging data from phase I and II trials reveals that a combinatorial treatment that includes TKIs and chemotherapy agents seems promising in terms of PFS despite some adverse effects recorded; whereas the use of mTOR inhibitors seems less effective. There is a need for further research into the inhibition of multiple signaling pathways in ovarian cancer and progression to phase III trials for drugs that seem most promising.

Indexed as

kinase inhibitorsmTORovarian cancerrapalogsTKI

Identifiers

PMID31547471
PMCPMC6770231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.