Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547457›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Comparative Study of Two Methods of Enteric Virus Detection and Enteric Virus Relationship with Bacterial Indicator in Poyang Lake, Jiangxi, China.

Xiaotong Wen, Huilie Zheng, Fang Yuan, Hui Zhu, Duyi Kuang, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuanan Lu, Zhaokang Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaotong WenSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China. 406530517824@email.ncu.edu.cn.
Huilie ZhengSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China. zhenghuilie@ncu.edu.cn.
Fang YuanOffice of Public Health Studies, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. fangy@hawaii.edu.
Hui ZhuSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China. ncuzhuhui@126.com.
Duyi KuangOffice of Public Health Studies, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. tina_kuang@berkeley.edu.
Zhiqiang ShenTianjin Institute of Health and Environmental Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Risk Assessment and Control Technology for Environment and Food Safety, Tianjin 300050, China. szq922990@126.com.
Yuanan LuSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China. yuanan@hawaii.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6854-6945
Zhaokang YuanSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China. yuanzhaokang@ncu.edu.cn.
Nanchang University · CNUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, water contaminated with fecal matter poses a threat to public health and safety. Thus, enteric viruses are tested for as a part of water quality indicator assays; however, enteric viruses have not yet been listed in the criteria. Effective and sensitive methods for detecting enteric viruses are required in order to increase water safety. This study utilized enteric viruses as possible alternative indicators of water quality to examine fresh water in six sites in Poyang Lake, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province. The presence of norovirus geno-groups II (NoV GII), enteroviruses (EoV) and adenoviruses (AdV) were determined using Tianjin's protocol and Hawaii's protocol during a six month period from 2016-2017. The former used an electropositive material method for viral concentration and Taqman-q reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect enteric viruses; while the latter used a filtration-based method for viral concentration and RT-PCR for enteric virus detection. There is a statistically significant difference between Tianjin's method and Hawaii's method for the detection of enteric viruses, such as NoV GII, EoV, and AdV (

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyBacteriaChinaEnterovirusFecesHumansLakesNorovirusReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionWater Qualityenteric virusindicatornucleic acid detection methodwater quality

Identifiers

PMID31547457
PMCPMC6765907
OpenAlexW2972325193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.