ArticleBrain sciences2019
Fetal Brain Abnormality Classification from MRI Images of Different Gestational Age.
Article in Brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Roles and applications of artificial intelligence in fetal and placental MRI: a literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Advances in automated fetal brain MRI segmentation and biometry: Insights from the FeTA 2024 challenge.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Fetal Assessment Suite (FetAS): a web-based platform for automatic fetal MRI analysis using AI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- [Research Progress in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Fetal Ventriculomegaly].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Review
- Color-CADx: a deep learning approach for colorectal cancer classification through triple convolutional neural networks and discrete cosine transform.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A novel Gateaux derivatives with efficient DCNN-Resunet method for segmenting multi-class brain tumor.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
- Automatic Ventriculomegaly Detection in Fetal Brain MRI: A Step-by-Step Deep Learning Model for Novel 2D-3D Linear Measurements.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence applied to fetal MRI: A scoping review of current research.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Review of deep learning and artificial intelligence models in fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Fet-Net Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Fetal Orientation in Fetal MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- GabROP: Gabor Wavelets-Based CAD for Retinopathy of Prematurity Diagnosis via Convolutional Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Framework for Lung and Colon Cancer Diagnosis via Lightweight Deep Learning Models and Transformation Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Novel Framework for Abnormal Risk Classification over Fetal Nuchal Translucency Using Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in paediatric neuroradiology.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- ECG-BiCoNet: An ECG-based pipeline for COVID-19 diagnosis using Bi-Layers of deep features integration.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- AI-Based Pipeline for Classifying Pediatric Medulloblastoma Using Histopathological and Textural Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fetal Organ Anomaly Classification Network for Identifying Organ Anomalies in Fetal MRI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- DIAROP: Automated Deep Learning-Based Diagnostic Tool for Retinopathy of Prematurity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Single-Input Multi-Output U-Net for Automated 2D Foetal Brain Segmentation of MR Images.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a common imaging technique used extensively to study human brain activities. Recently, it has been used for scanning the fetal brain. Amongst 1000 pregnant women, 3 of them have fetuses with brain abnormality. Hence, the primary detection and classification are important. Machine learning techniques have a large potential in aiding the early detection of these abnormalities, which correspondingly could enhance the diagnosis process and follow up plans. Most research focused on the classification of abnormal brains in a primary age has been for newborns and premature infants, with fewer studies focusing on images for fetuses. These studies associated fetal scans to scans after birth for the detection and classification of brain defects early in the neonatal age. This type of brain abnormality is named small for gestational age (SGA). This article proposes a novel framework for the classification of fetal brains at an early age (before the fetus is born). As far as we could know, this is the first study to classify brain abnormalities of fetuses of widespread gestational ages (GAs). The study incorporates several machine learning classifiers, such as diagonal quadratic discriminates analysis (DQDA), K-nearest neighbour (K-NN), random forest, naïve Bayes, and radial basis function (RBF) neural network classifiers. Moreover, several bagging and Adaboosting ensembles models have been constructed using random forest, naïve Bayes, and RBF network classifiers. The performances of these ensembles have been compared with their individual models. Our results show that our novel approach can successfully identify and classify numerous types of defects within MRI images of the fetal brain of various GAs. Using the KNN classifier, we were able to achieve the highest classification accuracy and area under receiving operating characteristics of 95.6% and 99% respectively. In addition, ensemble classifiers improved the results of their respective individual models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.