Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547095›Full record

ReviewInsects2019

Sex Pheromone Aerosol Devices for Mating Disruption: Challenges for a Brighter Future.

Giovanni Benelli, Andrea Lucchi, Donald Thomson, Claudio Ioriatti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mating Disruption ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Suspension of pheromone microcapsules on vine leaves acting as passive dispensers against pests.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giovanni BenelliDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy. giovanni.benelli@unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8971-6010
Andrea LucchiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy. andrea.lucchi@unipi.it.
Donald ThomsonPacific Biocontrol Corporation, 14615 NE 13th Court Suite A Vancouver, WA 98685, USA. dthomso123@mac.com.
Claudio IoriattiTechnological Transfer Centre and Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), via E. Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy. claudio.ioriatti@fmach.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pheromone-mediated mating disruption (MD) represents an important tool to manage insect pests in agriculture and forestry. MD relies on the release of synthetic sex pheromones from dispensers in crops, interfering with mate finding and reproduction of a pest through both competitive and non-competitive mechanisms. MD programs primarily rely upon "passive" dispensers, used at high densities per hectare (200-3000 units∙ha

Indexed as

beetle pestsinsect sex pheromonesintegrated pest managementmealybugsmoth pestsprecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID31547095
PMCPMC6835568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.