Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31547011›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Nanoparticles in Construction Materials and Other Applications, and Implications of Nanoparticle Use.

Abbas Mohajerani, Lucas Burnett, John V Smith, Halenur Kurmus, John Milas, Arul Arulrajah, Suksun Horpibulsuk, Aeslina Abdul Kadir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cellular andThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Interaction of TiOEnvironmental science. Nano · 2023
    Article
  19. Emerging Field of Nanotechnology in Environment.Indian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abbas MohajeraniSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia. abbas.mohajerani@rmit.edu.au.
Lucas BurnettSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia. s3588855@student.rmit.edu.au.
John V SmithSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia. john.smith2@rmit.edu.au.
Halenur KurmusSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia. s3432918@student.rmit.edu.au.
John MilasSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia. s3434124@student.rmit.edu.au.
Arul ArulrajahDepartment of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria 3122, Australia. aarulrajah@swin.edu.au.
Suksun HorpibulsukSchool of Civil Engineering and Center of Excellence in Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand. suksun@g.sut.ac.th.
Aeslina Abdul KadirFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia. aeslina@uthm.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles are defined as ultrafine particles sized between 1 and 100 nanometres in diameter. In recent decades, there has been wide scientific research on the various uses of nanoparticles in construction, electronics, manufacturing, cosmetics, and medicine. The advantages of using nanoparticles in construction are immense, promising extraordinary physical and chemical properties for modified construction materials. Among the many different types of nanoparticles, titanium dioxide, carbon nanotubes, silica, copper, clay, and aluminium oxide are the most widely used nanoparticles in the construction sector. The promise of nanoparticles as observed in construction is reflected in other adoptive industries, driving the growth in demand and production quantity at an exorbitant rate. The objective of this study was to analyse the use of nanoparticles within the construction industry to exemplify the benefits of nanoparticle applications and to address the short-term and long-term effects of nanoparticles on the environment and human health within the microcosm of industry so that the findings may be generalised. The benefits of nanoparticle utilisation are demonstrated through specific applications in common materials, particularly in normal concrete, asphalt concrete, bricks, timber, and steel. In addition, the paper addresses the potential benefits and safety barriers for using nanomaterials, with consideration given to key areas of knowledge associated with exposure to nanoparticles that may have implications for health and environmental safety. The field of nanotechnology is considered rather young compared to established industries, thus limiting the time for research and risk analysis. Nevertheless, it is pertinent that research and regulation precede the widespread adoption of potentially harmful particles to mitigate undue risk.

Indexed as

construction materialsenvironmental implicationshealth implicationsmaterialsnanoparticlesrisk assessmentsustainability

Identifiers

PMID31547011
PMCPMC6804222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.