ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Enhancement of Multimodal Microwave-Ultrasound Breast Imaging Using a Deep-Learning Technique.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Efficient Cross-Modal Interaction and Dynamic Fusion Network for Multimodal Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- BCDCNN: breast cancer deep convolutional neural network for breast cancer detection using MRI images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted multimodal imaging for the clinical applications of breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Microwave Medical Imaging and Lesion Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Two-Step Contrast Source Learning Method for Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering Problems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review of Microwave Near-Field Sensing and Imaging Devices in Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Training Universal Deep-Learning Networks for Electromagnetic Medical Imaging Using a Large Database of Randomized Objects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Application of the Model of Spots for Inverse Problems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Generation of Prior Information in a Dual-Mode Microwave-Ultrasound Breast Imaging System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Breast Cancer Prediction Empowered with Fine-Tuning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Tumors under the Guidance of Deep Learning Algorithms.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Review
- Full 3D Microwave Breast Imaging Using a Deep-Learning Technique.Journal of imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a deep learning method used in conjunction with dual-modal microwave-ultrasound imaging to produce tomographic reconstructions of the complex-valued permittivity of numerical breast phantoms. We also assess tumor segmentation performance using the reconstructed permittivity as a feature. The contrast source inversion (CSI) technique is used to create the complex-permittivity images of the breast with ultrasound-derived tissue regions utilized as prior information. However, imaging artifacts make the detection of tumors difficult. To overcome this issue we train a convolutional neural network (CNN) that takes in, as input, the dual-modal CSI reconstruction and attempts to produce the true image of the complex tissue permittivity. The neural network consists of successive convolutional and downsampling layers, followed by successive deconvolutional and upsampling layers based on the U-Net architecture. To train the neural network, the input-output pairs consist of CSI's dual-modal reconstructions, along with the true numerical phantom images from which the microwave scattered field was synthetically generated. The reconstructed permittivity images produced by the CNN show that the network is not only able to remove the artifacts that are typical of CSI reconstructions, but can also improve the detectability of tumors. The performance of the CNN is assessed using a four-fold cross-validation on our dataset that shows improvement over CSI both in terms of reconstruction error and tumor segmentation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.