Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31546827›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

E-Beam Irradiation and Ozonation as an Alternative to the Sulphuric Method of Wine Preservation.

Magdalena Błaszak, Agata Nowak, Sabina Lachowicz, Wojciech Migdał, Ireneusz Ochmian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Innovative Applications of High Hydrostatic Pressure in Winemaking.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effectiveness of E-Beam Radiation againstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena BłaszakDepartment of Chemistry, Microbiology and Environmental Biotechnology, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17 Street, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland. blaszak.magdalena@zut.edu.pl.
Agata NowakDepartment of Chemistry, Microbiology and Environmental Biotechnology, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17 Street, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland. agata.nowak@onet.eu.
Sabina LachowiczDepartment of Fermentation and Cereals Technology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 37 Street, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland. sabina.lachowicz@upwr.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6182-0211
Wojciech MigdałInstitute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, 16 Dorodna Street, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland. w.migdal@ichtj.waw.pl.
Ireneusz OchmianDepartment of Horticulture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17 Street, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland. iochmian@zut.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-3606-1927
West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin · PLInstytut Chemii i Techniki Jądrowej · PLWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potassium metabisulphite is usually used for microbial stabilization in the process of vinification and wine preservation, but it is considered to be allergenic. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficiency of ozonation and ionizing radiation as alternatives to wine sulphurization. The efficiency of yeast removal and the retention of the chemical quality of wine were evaluated. Wine was subjected to 60 min of ozonation, and radiation doses were set at 1-10 kGy. Moreover, a combination of ozonation and ionizing radiation treatment was used. The ozonation of wine did not produce the expected results. That is, it did not limit the number of yeast cells. From the sixth minute, a significant deterioration in the taste and the color of the wine was found. Ionizing radiation at a dose of 1 kGy reduced the yeast count by 95.5%, and a reduction of 99.9% was seen after the application of 2.5 kGy. Moreover, these doses did not have a significant effect on the organoleptic properties or the chemical composition of wine. The total amount of polyphenols reduced from the maximum of 1127.15 to 1023.73 mg at the dose of 5 kGy. Radiation is widely used to preserve food products. Its use for finished wine preservation may be an alternative to sulphurization.

Indexed as

ElectronsFood PreservationMicrobial ViabilityOzoneSensationSulfitesSulfurTime FactorsWineYeastsOzonepotassium metabisulfiteSulfitesSulfurcolorpolyphenolswine preservationwine qualityyeast

Identifiers

PMID31546827
PMCPMC6766795
OpenAlexW2974812807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.