ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Conditioning by Means of Customized Healing Abutment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PEEK Versus Titanium Customized Healing Abutments: Evaluation of Peri-implant Soft Tissues and Sulcus Fluid Bacterial Load
Peri-implant Soft Tissue Response to Direct Zirconia-Based Composite Customized Healing Abutment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study With Biochemical Analysis
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of customized healing abutments in immediate implants: a randomized clinical trial.Brazilian oral research · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of surface roughness and cell viability of milled and printed polyetheretherketone healing abutments: a comparative study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Optimised Magnetic Field-Assisted Finishing Improves Surface and Mechanical Performance of CAD/CAM Titanium Abutments.International dental journal · 2026Article
- A prospective randomized split-mouth trial comparing immediate versus early anterior implant placement with customized healing abutments: 12-month marginal bone loss, stability, and esthetic outcome.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes Between Root-Analog Zirconia and Conventional Zirconia Implants: A Prospective Clinical Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Microshear bond strength of resin composite to Ti6A14V titanium alloy after different chemical and mechanical surface treatments.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Insights into the Current Management Techniques for Peri-Implant Gaps: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prosthetic Soft Tissue Management in Esthetic Implant Restorations, Part II: Post-surgical Considerations and Impression Techniques. A Narrative Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Review
- Comparison of Plaque Accumulation Between Titanium and PEEK Healing Abutments.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Effect of Customized and Prefabricated Healing Abutments on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue and Bone in Immediate Implant Sites: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Poncho Lamina Technique: A Protocol for Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation in Atrophic Ridges Receiving Adjacent Implants.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Correlation between Accuracy in Computer-Guided Implantology and Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Immediate Implant and Customized Healing Abutment for a Periodontally Compromised Socket: 1-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparative Study of Dental Custom CAD-CAM Implant Abutments and Dental Implant Stock Abutments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Gelatin-Curcumin Nanocomposites as a Coating for Implant Healing Abutment: In Vitro Stability Investigation.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Biomaterials and Clinical Applications of Customized Healing Abutment-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Dental Implant Materials: Current State and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Buccal Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation by Means of a Porcine Collagen Matrix: A Proof of Concept Technical Note.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Effect of Different Cleaning Protocols of Polymer-Based Prosthetic Materials on the Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn optimal aesthetic implant restoration is a combination of a visually pleasing prosthesis and adequate surrounding peri-implant soft tissue architecture. This study describes a novel workflow for one-step formation of the supra-implant emergence profile. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo randomized groups were selected. Ten control group participants received standard healing screws at the surgical stage. Ten individualized healing abutments were Computer aided Design/Computer aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-fabricated out of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) restoration material in a fully digital workflow and seated at the surgical stage in the test group. The modified healing abutment shape was extracted from a virtual library. The standard triangulation language (STL) files of a premolar and a molar were obtained considering the coronal anatomy up to the cement-enamel junction (CEJ). After a healing period ranging from 1 to 3 months depending on the location of the surgical site, namely, mandible or maxilla, a digital impression was taken. The functional implant prosthodontics score (FIPS) and the numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain were recorded and compared.
resultsThe mean FIPS value for the test group was 9.1 ± 0.9 while the control group mean value was 7.1 ± 0.9. In the test group, pain assessment at crown placement presented a mean value of 0.5 ± 0.7. On the contrary, the control group showed a mean value of 5.5 ± 1.6.
conclusionsPatients in the test group showed higher FIPS values and lower NRS scores during the early phases compared to the control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.