Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31546790›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Nunzio Antonio Cacciola, Giuseppe Squillaci, Mariella D'Apolito, Orsolina Petillo, Francesco Veraldi, Francesco La Cara, Gianfranco Peluso, Sabrina Margarucci, Alessandra Morana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. By-Product Extracts fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sweet Chestnut (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Untargeted Characterization of Chestnut (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nunzio Antonio CacciolaResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. nunzioantonio.cacciola@unina.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0780-9844
Giuseppe SquillaciResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. giuseppe.squillaci@iret.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-3564
Mariella D'ApolitoResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. maria.dapolito@cnr.it.
Orsolina PetilloResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. orsolina.petillo@cnr.it.
Francesco VeraldiResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. fr.veraldi@gmail.com.
Francesco La CaraResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. francesco.lacara@cnr.it.
Gianfranco PelusoResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. gianfranco.peluso@cnr.it.
Sabrina MargarucciResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. sabrina.margarucci@cnr.it.
Alessandra MoranaResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy, (CNR), Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy. alessandra.morana@cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3189-2526
National Research Council · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

National Operative Program (PON 2007-2013) PON MAREA 03_00106_1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, chestnut shells (CS) were used in order to obtain bioactive compounds through different extraction procedures. The aqueous extracts were chemically characterized. The highest extraction yield and total phenolic content was obtained by conventional liquid extraction (CLE). Gallic and protocatechuic acids were the main simple phenols in the extract, with 86.97 and 11.20 mg/g chestnut shells dry extract (CSDE), respectively. Six tumor cell lines (DU 145, PC-3, LNCaP, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and HepG2) and one normal prostate epithelial cell line (PNT2) were exposed to increasing concentration of CSDE (1-100 µg/mL) for 24 h, and cell viability was evaluated using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide MTT assay. A reduced rate in cell viability was observed in DU 145, PC-3, LNCaP, and MCF-7 cells, while viability of the other assessed cells was not affected, except for PNT2 cells at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Furthermore, CSDE-at concentrations of 55.5 and 100 µg/mL-lead to a significant increase of apoptotic cells in DU 145 cells of 28.2% and 61%, respectively. In conclusion, these outcomes suggested that CS might be used for the extraction of several polyphenols that may represent good candidates for alternative therapies or in combination with current chemotherapeutics.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorFagaceaeHumansPhenolsPlant ExtractsWaterAntineoplastic AgentsPhenolsPlant ExtractsWaterapoptosisbioactive compoundschestnut shellscytotoxicityhuman cell linespolyphenols

Identifiers

PMID31546790
PMCPMC6767178
OpenAlexW2967622559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.