Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31546652›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2019

Steroidomics for the Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Cancers: A Systematic Review and Functional Analysis.

Nguyen Hoang Anh, Nguyen Phuoc Long, Sun Jo Kim, Jung Eun Min, Sang Jun Yoon, Hyung Min Kim, Eugine Yang, Eun Sook Hwang, Jeong Hill Park, Soon-Sun Hong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nguyen Hoang AnhCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. 2018-23140@snu.ac.kr.
Nguyen Phuoc LongCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. phuoclong@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-0546
Sun Jo KimCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. danielkim27@snu.ac.kr.
Jung Eun MinCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. mje0107@snu.ac.kr.
Sang Jun YoonCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. supercanboy@snu.ac.kr.
Hyung Min KimCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. snuhmkim04@snu.ac.kr.
Eugine YangCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea. ginayang95@gmail.com.
Eun Sook HwangCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea. eshwang@ewha.ac.kr.
Jeong Hill ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. hillpark@snu.ac.kr.
Soon-Sun HongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea. hongs@inha.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-1388
Sung Won KwonCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. swkwon@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-4737
Seoul National University · KREwha Womans University · KRInha University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1A5A2024425/2018R1D1A1A02046560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steroidomics, an analytical technique for steroid biomarker mining, has received much attention in recent years. This systematic review and functional analysis, following the PRISMA statement, aims to provide a comprehensive review and an appraisal of the developments and fundamental issues in steroid high-throughput analysis, with a focus on cancer research. We also discuss potential pitfalls and proposed recommendations for steroidomics-based clinical research. Forty-five studies met our inclusion criteria, with a focus on 12 types of cancer. Most studies focused on cancer risk prediction, followed by diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy monitoring. Prostate cancer was the most frequently studied cancer. Estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and cortisol were mostly reported and altered in at least four types of cancer. Estrogen and estrogen metabolites were highly reported to associate with women-related cancers. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that steroidogenesis; androgen and estrogen metabolism; and androstenedione metabolism were significantly altered in cancers. Our findings indicated that estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone, cortisol, and estrogen metabolites, among others, could be considered oncosteroids. Despite noble achievements, significant shortcomings among the investigated studies were small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs, potential confounding factors, and problematic statistical approaches. More efforts are required to establish standardized procedures regarding study design, analytical procedures, and statistical inference.

Indexed as

biomarkercancerdiagnosisfunctional analysisprognosissteroidomicssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31546652
PMCPMC6835899
OpenAlexW2974805241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.