Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31546482›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2019

Eye donation in north India: Trends, awareness, influences and barriers.

Manisha Acharya, Javed Hussain Farooqui, Abhishek Dave, Deepali Chaku, K K Ganguly, Animesh Das, Umang Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Indian eye banking at crossroads: From volume to value.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comments: Pendleton'sIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manisha AcharyaCornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Javed Hussain FarooquiCornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Abhishek DaveCornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Deepali ChakuEye Bank Services, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
K K GangulyIndian Institute of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Animesh DasEye Bank Services, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Umang MathurCornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To understand trends, awareness, influences and barriers to eye donation in Indian society. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in Delhi from March 2017 to February 2018. About 10 hospitals collaborated with the Eye Bank under Human Cornea Retrieval Program (HCRP). Eye Bank recruited Eye Donation Counselors (EDCs) to approach family members of the deceased. A pretested questionnaire was used for this study. Irrespective of whether the next of kin of the deceased consented for eye donation or not, the option of participating in the survey was given. Results: Out of 473 potential donors identified, 407 (86%) next of kin consented to participate in the study. Of these, 388 (95.3%) were males and 19 (4.7%) were females. About 168 (41%) consented for eye donation and were assigned to donor group, while 239 (59%) participants refused eye donation and were assigned to non-donor group. Majority of the participants were siblings 170 (41.8%) of the deceased and the mean age of the deceased was 42.71 ± 17.56 years. The foremost concern before decision-making was transparency in how the cornea would be used (32.25%). The concern with regards to whether the body would remain intact after eye donation significantly decreased the probability of consent for eye donation. Conclusion: The study highlights that barriers to eye donation in India are not cultural or religious but more due to misinformation and proper utilization of the donated tissue. This study also emphasizes the pivotal role of EDC's in facilitating the eye donation movement.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAwarenessChildChild, PreschoolCorneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationCounselorsCross-Sectional StudiesEye BanksFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansAwarenessbarrierscorneal blindnesseye bankeye donationeye donation counselorshospital cornea retrieval programme

Identifiers

PMID31546482
PMCPMC6786220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.