Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31545856›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2019

Protein delivery by porous cationic maltodextrin-based nanoparticles into nasal mucosal cells: Comparison with cationic or anionic nanoparticles.

Minh Quan Lê, Rodolphe Carpentier, Isabelle Lantier, Céline Ducournau, François Fasquelle, Isabelle Dimier-Poisson, Didier Betbeder

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nasal vaccination of six squirrel monkeys (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minh Quan LêInserm, LIRIC - UMR 995, F-59 000 Lille, France.
Rodolphe CarpentierInserm, LIRIC - UMR 995, F-59 000 Lille, France.
Isabelle LantierINRA - Université de Tours, UMR1282, F-37380 Nouzilly, France.
Céline DucournauUniversité de Tours - INRA, UMR1282, F-37000 Tours, France.
François FasquelleInserm, LIRIC - UMR 995, F-59 000 Lille, France.
Isabelle Dimier-PoissonUniversité de Tours - INRA, UMR1282, F-37000 Tours, France.
Didier BetbederInserm, LIRIC - UMR 995, F-59 000 Lille, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different types of biodegradable nanoparticles (NPs) have been studied as delivery systems for proteins into nasal mucosal cells, especially for vaccine applications. Such a nanocarrier must have the ability to be loaded with proteins and to transport this payload into mucosal cells. However, comparative data on nanoparticles' capacity for protein loading, efficiency of subsequent endocytosis and the quantity of nanocarriers used are either lacking or contradictory, making comparisons and the choice of a best candidate difficult. Here we compared 5 types of nanoparticles with different surface charge (anionic or cationic) and various inner compositions as potential vectors: the NPL (cationic maltodextrin NP with an anionic lipid core), cationic and anionic PLGA (Poly Lactic co-Glycolic Acid) NP, and cationic and anionic liposomes. We first quantified the protein association efficiency and NPL associated the largest amount of ovalbumin, used as a model protein.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNasalProtein deliveryVaccine

Identifiers

PMID31545856
PMCPMC6733295
OpenAlexW2947295947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.