Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31545557›Full record

ReviewJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2020

Using Implementation Science to Further the Adoption and Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Rural Primary Care.

Heather Nelson-Brantley, Carol Buller, Christie Befort, Edward Ellerbeck, Ariel Shifter, Shellie Ellis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather Nelson-BrantleyDelta, Assistant Professor, University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-7801
Carol BullerDelta, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Christie BefortAssociate Professor and Associate Director for Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Preventative Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Edward EllerbeckProfessor and Chair of the Department of Preventative Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Ariel ShifterGraduate Research Assistant, Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Shellie EllisAssistant Professor, Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Funding

Using Integrated Omics to Identify Dysfunctional Genetic Mechanisms Influencing Schizophrenia and Sleep DisturbancesP20GM130423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDREW K. GODWIN · 2019 to 2026
$21.5M
Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implemention Research in CancerR25CA171994 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA171994NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the literature on advance care planning (ACP) in primary care through the lens of implementation science, with a focus on implications for rural settings.

designScoping review of the literature.

methodsThe Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, PsycINFO, and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection databases were searched for studies related to ACP adoption and implementation in primary care. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to map the literature to 14 determinants that serve as barriers or facilitators to ACP. The Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors was used to analyze the stage of implementation for each of the included studies.

findingsFour steps to ACP were specified: identification, conversation, documentation, and follow-up. Determinants were identified for each step, but studies largely focused on the conversation step. Professional role and identity, environmental context and resources, and emotion were the most frequently cited determinants in initiating conversations. The identification step was largely determined by behavioral regulation. For documenting ACP, environmental context and resource determinants were most prevalent. In the few studies that addressed follow-up, providers expressed a desire for electronic reminders as a behavioral regulator to follow-up.

conclusionsWhile ACP has been shown to have patient, family, and societal benefits, its uptake in primary care has been minimal. Because ACP is a complex process that is highly context dependent, implementation science is critical to inform its successful adoption and implementation. Smaller healthcare networks, adaptable professional roles, trusted relationships, and tight-knit community might be important facilitators of ACP in rural primary care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings from this study can be used to accelerate ACP implementation in rural primary care.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCommunicationImplementation ScienceDelivery of Health CareDocumentationHumansInterdisciplinary ResearchModels, OrganizationalPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentRural Health ServicesRural PopulationTerminal CareTrustAdvance care planningimplementation scienceprimary carerural

Identifiers

PMID31545557
PMCPMC6953624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.