ReviewJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2020
Using Implementation Science to Further the Adoption and Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Rural Primary Care.
Review in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of preparation in implementation for rural healthcare innovation: a multi method evaluation of a virtual medical officer model of inpatient care in Australia.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Disparities in Advance Care Planning Across Rurality, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Cognition Levels: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.Journal of ageing and longevity · 2024Article
- Determinants of Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Use by Primary Care Providers and Dementia Specialists.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Characteristics of international primary care practices and physicians related to advance care planning: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Can a 5-to-90-day Mortality Predictor Perform Consistently Across Time and Equitably Across Populations?Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
- Understanding Factors That Predict Advance Directive Completion.Palliative medicine reports · 2022Article
- Primary Care Professionals' Self-Efficacy Surrounding Advance Care Planning and Its Link to Sociodemographics, Background and Perceptions: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Advance care planning in Dutch primary care: a pre/post-implementation study.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2021Article
- Physician perceived barriers and facilitators for self-measured blood pressure monitoring- a qualitative study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Preconditions Contributing to Interprofessional Collaboration in the Management of COPD in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the literature on advance care planning (ACP) in primary care through the lens of implementation science, with a focus on implications for rural settings.
designScoping review of the literature.
methodsThe Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, PsycINFO, and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection databases were searched for studies related to ACP adoption and implementation in primary care. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to map the literature to 14 determinants that serve as barriers or facilitators to ACP. The Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors was used to analyze the stage of implementation for each of the included studies.
findingsFour steps to ACP were specified: identification, conversation, documentation, and follow-up. Determinants were identified for each step, but studies largely focused on the conversation step. Professional role and identity, environmental context and resources, and emotion were the most frequently cited determinants in initiating conversations. The identification step was largely determined by behavioral regulation. For documenting ACP, environmental context and resource determinants were most prevalent. In the few studies that addressed follow-up, providers expressed a desire for electronic reminders as a behavioral regulator to follow-up.
conclusionsWhile ACP has been shown to have patient, family, and societal benefits, its uptake in primary care has been minimal. Because ACP is a complex process that is highly context dependent, implementation science is critical to inform its successful adoption and implementation. Smaller healthcare networks, adaptable professional roles, trusted relationships, and tight-knit community might be important facilitators of ACP in rural primary care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings from this study can be used to accelerate ACP implementation in rural primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.