ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
KRAS and BRAF mutations induce anoikis resistance and characteristic 3D phenotypes in Caco‑2 cells.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic Insights into Piperine-Driven Oxidative Stress, Autophagy Activation and Anti-Migration Effects in Caco-2 Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Differential effects of KRAS G-domain and hypervariable region mutants on cancer phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Strictosamide and mitraphylline inhibit cancer cell motility by suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition via integrin α4-mediated signaling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anoikis-related signature identifies tumor microenvironment landscape and predicts prognosis and drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Review
- Putative anoikis resistant subpopulations are enriched in lymph node metastases and indicate adverse prognosis in colorectal carcinoma.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022Article
- A Case of Colonic Micropapillary Carcinoma with a High Frequency of Apoptosis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022Article
- Material Engineering in Gut Microbiome and Human Health.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Review
- A proximity proteomics screen in three-dimensional spheroid cultures identifies novel regulators of lumen formation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comprehensive understanding of anchorage-independent survival and its implication in cancer metastasis.Cell death & disease · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a number of types of cancer, anoikis, a form of apoptosis induced by loss of extracellular matrix (ECM) attachment, is disturbed. Anoikis resistance is essential in the formation of metastases. A recent study identified carcinoma cell subpopulations surviving without ECM contact in pathological specimens of colorectal cancer. The occurrence of these subpopulations indicated anoikis resistance. In the present study, it is demonstrated that KRAS and BRAF mutations induce anoikis resistance in colon cancer (Caco‑2) cells. In 3D cultures, Caco‑2 cells transfected with mutated KRAS or BRAF formed multicellular structures analogous to anoikis‑resistant subpopulations in actual carcinomas, and serve as an in vitro model for anoikis resistance. Caco‑2 cell lines were constructed, with KRAS or BRAF mutations, using retroviral delivery. The current study investigated anoikis resistance using an Annexin V apoptosis test from suspension cultures. 3D in vitro cultures, which were generated in collagen‑matrigel mixtures, were assessed using confocal microscopy. 3D cultures embedded in paraffin were analyzed using conventional histopathology. In suspension cultures, Caco‑2 cells with KRAS or BRAF mutations indicated a significantly lower proportion of Annexin positivity than the native Caco‑2 cells, indicating that these mutations induce anoikis resistance in Caco‑2 cells. 3D cultures displayed native Caco‑2 cells forming polarized cysts with a single layer thick epithelium, whereas Caco‑2 cells with KRAS or BRAF mutations formed partially filled cystic structures or solid round structures where only the outermost layer was in contact with the ECM. Additionally, KRAS mutations induced reversed polarity to Caco‑2 cells along with the emergence of solid growth. The present study demonstrated that KRAS and BRAF mutations induce anoikis resistance in Caco‑2 colorectal cancer cells. The growth patterns generated from the KRAS and BRAF mutated cells in 3D cultures revealed a resemblance to the putative anoikis‑resistant subpopulations in actual carcinomas, including micropapillary structures and solid tumor cell islands. Additionally, KRAS mutation induced the emergence of inverted polarity. In conclusion, 3D cultures with modified Caco‑2 cells serve as a valid in vitro model for anoikis resistance and inverted polarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.