Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31545410›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2019

Selective uveal melanoma inhibition with calcium channel blockade.

Michael Shaughnessy, Grace Lamuraglia, Nikolai Klebanov, Zhenyu Ji, Anpuchchelvi Rajadurai, Raj Kumar, Keith Flaherty, Hensin Tsao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. T-Type Calcium Channels: A Mixed Blessing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael ShaughnessyWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Grace LamuragliaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Nikolai KlebanovWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Zhenyu JiWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Anpuchchelvi RajaduraiWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Raj KumarWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Keith FlahertyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Melanoma, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Hensin TsaoWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2605, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal malignant melanoma (UMM), the most common primary adult intraocular tumor with a marked metastatic potential, is genetically unique and has unfortunately had few treatment breakthroughs. In this study, we subjected a UMM cell line to high‑throughput library screening with 1,018 FDA‑approved compounds to identify potential UMM‑selective cytotoxic agents. Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), ranked no. 2 and no. 8 of the most cytotoxic compounds. Thus, we further characterized the differential effects of calcium blockade on UMM and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) lines in vitro using growth inhibition, cell cycle progression, apoptosis and senescence assays. Amlodipine had a significantly higher growth inhibitory potency in UMM (IC50=13.1 µM) than CMM (IC50=15.9 µM, P<0.05) lines. In 3D spherical cell culture, amlodipine treatment significantly impaired tissue volume growth in two UMM lines, but exerted no significant effects among all 3 CMM lines tested. Treatment with 10 and 20 µM amlodipine induced a significant impairment of cell cycle progression and the apoptosis of UMM lines, implicating both of these processes as mediators of the observed growth inhibition in UMM compared to CMM. On the whole, the findings of this study suggest that calcium channel blockade is a potentially effective strategy for selective uveal melanoma targeting.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsCell CycleCell MovementCell ProliferationHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMelanomaTumor Cells, CulturedUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels

Identifiers

PMID31545410
PMCPMC6776194
OpenAlexW2972303756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.