Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31544963›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2020

Analysis of secondary phenotypes in multigroup association studies.

Fan Zhou, Haibo Zhou, Tengfei Li, Hongtu Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fan ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2874-2148
Haibo ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-0093
Tengfei LiDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Hongtu ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6781-2690

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Imaging Data in Curved SpaceR01MH086633 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
Genome-wide Identification of Variants Affecting Early Human Brain DevelopmentR01MH092335 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KNICKMEYER, REBECCA · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Analysis of Big Data Squared in Biomedical StudiesR01MH116527 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIMH NIH HHS 086633NIMH NIH HHS 116527NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086633NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although case-control association studies have been widely used, they are insufficient for many complex diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and breast cancer, since these diseases may have multiple subtypes with distinct morphologies and clinical implications. Many multigroup studies, such as the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), have been undertaken by recruiting subjects based on their multiclass primary disease status, while extensive secondary outcomes have been collected. The aim of this paper is to develop a general regression framework for the analysis of secondary phenotypes collected in multigroup association studies. Our regression framework is built on a conditional model for the secondary outcome given the multigroup status and covariates and its relationship with the population regression of interest of the secondary outcome given the covariates. Then, we develop generalized estimation equations to estimate the parameters of interest. We use both simulations and a large-scale imaging genetic data analysis from the ADNI to evaluate the effect of the multigroup sampling scheme on standard genome-wide association analyses based on linear regression methods, while comparing it with our statistical methods that appropriately adjust for the multigroup sampling scheme. Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the ADNI database.

Indexed as

PhenotypeRegression AnalysisAlzheimer DiseaseApolipoproteins EBiometryCase-Control StudiesCognitive DysfunctionComputer SimulationGenetic Association StudiesHippocampusHumansLikelihood FunctionsLinear ModelsMembrane Transport ProteinsMitochondrial Precursor Protein Import Complex ProteinsModels, StatisticalApoE protein, humanApolipoproteins EMembrane Transport ProteinsMitochondrial Precursor Protein Import Complex ProteinsTOMM40 protein, humanascertainmentgenome-wide association studymultigroupsecondary traitselection bias

Identifiers

PMID31544963
PMCPMC7085961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.