Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31544941›Full record

SynthesisPoultry science2019

Withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters from broiler diets: performance indexes and economic impact.

Katia Maria Cardinal, Marcos Kipper, Ines Andretta, Andréa Machado Leal Ribeiro

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Supplementation of nanoencapsulatedOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Amino Acid Nutrition in Poultry: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katia Maria CardinalDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 7712 - Agronomia, CEP: 91540-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Marcos KipperDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 7712 - Agronomia, CEP: 91540-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ines AndrettaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 7712 - Agronomia, CEP: 91540-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Andréa Machado Leal RibeiroDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 7712 - Agronomia, CEP: 91540-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the productive and economic impacts caused by the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from broilers diet. Indexed publications that compared diets with or without AGP (AGP+/AGP-) for broilers (from initial to final phase) were collected and the results of feed intake, weight gain, and feed conversion were compiled in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following sequential analyses: graphical approach (to observe biological data coherence), correlation (to identify related factors), and variance-covariance (to compare groups). The annual number of broiler slaughtered in Brazil, target weight gain and feed conversion for each phase, the variation in feed conversion, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build a model to estimate the effects of the AGP withdrawal on feeding costs. The database comprised 174 scientific articles containing 183 experiments, totaling 121,643 broilers, most of which were Ross (52% of the studies). The most frequent AGP sources/forms in the database were Avilamycin (41% of the AGP+ treatments), Flavomycin (19%), Virginiamycin (16%), and Bacitracin (14%). Higher feed intake, weight gain, and lower feed conversion were attributed (P < 0.05) to AGP+ diets during Initial phase (1 to 21 D). In Final phase (22 to 42 D) no differences were observed in performance variables. Treatments AGP+ presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion in the Total period (1 to 42 D). The results of feed conversion were improved (P < 0.05) with Avilamycin and Flavomycin; Virginiamycin improved weight gain and feed conversion. In the Total period, the economic impact was $0.03 per animal and a total of $183,560,232 per year. It was concluded that broilers fed AGP+ diets have higher weight gain and better feed conversion than those fed AGP- diets, and withdrawing AGP increases production costs.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBrazilChickensDietDietary SupplementsFemaleGrowth SubstancesMaleModels, TheoreticalAnti-Bacterial AgentsGrowth Substancesbroiler chickenfeed conversionproductive costsensitivity analysisweight gain

Identifiers

PMID31544941
PMCPMC8913991
OpenAlexW2975590811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.