Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31544898›Full record

ArticleBiomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2019

Characteristic CT features of pheochromocytomas - probability model calculation tool based on a multicentric study.

Filip Ctvrtlik, Zbynek Tudos, Paulina Szasz, Zuzana Sedlackova, Igor Hartmann, Jan Schovanek, Zdenek Frysak, Iva Macova, Tomas Zelinka, Milan Hora and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cystic lesions of the adrenal gland.BMJ case reports · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metastatic Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Filip CtvrtlikDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zbynek TudosDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Paulina SzaszDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zuzana SedlackovaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Igor HartmannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan SchovanekDepartment of Internal Medicine III - Nephrology, Rheumatology, and Endocrinology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zdenek FrysakDepartment of Internal Medicine III - Nephrology, Rheumatology, and Endocrinology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Iva MacovaDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas ZelinkaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Milan HoraDepartment of Urology, Faculty Hospital Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
Eva KocovaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav PacovskyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Czech Republic.
Michal KrsekSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Royal Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Viera LehotskaSecond Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava and St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Emilia MojtovaDepartment of Endocrinology, Slovak Medical University and St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Josef MolnarDepartment of Algebra and Geometry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Vladimir VanekDepartment of Algebra and Geometry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Karel PacakSection on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jan BaxaDepartment of Imaging Methods, University Hospital Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
Palacký University Olomouc · CZCharles University · CZUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZComenius University Bratislava · SKNational Institutes of Health · USSlovak Medical University · SK

Funding

Diagnosis, Pathophysiology And Molecular Biology of Pheochromocytoma and ParagangliomaZIAHD008735 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI PACAK, KAREL · 2009 to 2024
$28.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the CT features of adrenal tumors in an effort to identify features specific to pheochromocytomas and second, to define a feasible probability calculation model.

methodsThis multicentric retrospective study included patients from the period 2003 to 2017 with an appropriate CT examination and a histological diagnosis of an adrenal adenoma, pheochromocytoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, or metastasis. In total, 346 patients were suitable for the CT image analysis, which included evaluation of the largest diameter, the shape of the lesion, the presence of central necrosis and its margins, and the presence of an enhancing peripheral rim ("ring sign").

resultsPheochromocytomas have a significantly more spherical shape (P<0.001), whereas an elliptical shape significantly reduces the probability of a pheochromocytoma (odds ratio = 0.015), as does another shape (odds ratio = 0.006). A "ring sign" is also more frequent in pheochromocytomas compared to other adrenal tumors (P=0.001, odds ratio = 6.49). A sharp necrosis also increases the probability of a pheochromocytoma more than unsharp necrosis (odds ratio 231.6 vs. 20.2). The probability calculation model created on the basis of the results confirms a high sensitivity and specificity (80% and 95%).

conclusionThis study confirms the value of anatomical features in the assessment of adrenal masses with the ability to significantly improve the identification of pheochromocytomas. Advanced assessment of the tumor shape was defined and a original comprehensive calculating tool of the pheochromocytoma probability was created on the basis of the results presented here and could be used in clinical routine.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsAdrenocortical CarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNeoplasm MetastasisPheochromocytomaRegression AnalysisTomography, Spiral ComputedYoung Adultadrenocortical adenomaadrenocortical carcinomahelical computed tomographymetastasispheochromocytoma

Identifiers

PMID31544898
PMCPMC6875693
OpenAlexW2975661560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.