Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31544873›Full record

ArticleAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Thinking outside the Laboratory: Analyses of Antibody Structure and Dynamics within Different Solvent Environments in Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations.

Mohammed M Al Qaraghuli, Karina Kubiak-Ossowska, Paul A Mulheran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Direct Immobilization of Engineered Nanobodies on Gold Sensors.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021
    Article
  9. Atomic Model Structure of the NIST Monoclonal Antibody (NISTmAb) Reference Material.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed M Al QaraghuliDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK. mohammed.al-qaraghuli@strath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1823-6671
Karina Kubiak-OssowskaDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK. karina.kubiak@strath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-2111
Paul A MulheranDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK. paul.mulheran@strath.ac.uk.
University of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R51178X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the biomedical field, directly influencing therapeutics and diagnostics in the biopharmaceutical industry, while continuing advances in computational efficiency have enabled molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to provide atomistic insight into the structure and function of mAbs. Despite the success of MD tools, further optimizations are still required to enhance the computational efficiency of complex mAb simulations. This issue can be tackled by changing the way the solvent system is modelled to reduce the number of atoms to be tracked but must be done without compromising the accuracy of the simulations. In this work, the structure of the IgG

Indexed as

antibodyexplicit solventimplicit solventmolecular dynamics (MD)root-mean-square distance (RMSD)root-mean-square fluctuations (RMSF)

Identifiers

PMID31544873
PMCPMC6640683
OpenAlexW2809232020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.