ArticleJournal of genetics2019
Comparative analysis of camelid mitochondrial genomes.
Article in Journal of genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- De novo mitogenome assembly and phylogenetic implications of the first Indian yak breed-Arunachali (Bos or Poephagus grunniens L.).Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Analysis of Indian Dromedary Breeds Based on the Mitochondrial D-Loop Marker.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial DNA of the Arabian CamelAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Omics in the Red Palm WeevilInsects · 2023Review
- Genetic similarity and diversity among three camel populations reared in Egypt.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2022Article
- Complete mitochondrial genome sequence ofZooKeys · 2021Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome of Indian gaur, Bos gaurus and its phylogenetic implications.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Camelids: new players in the international animal production context.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31544791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.