Learning Not Just From But With Citizens: The Importance of Co-Design in Health-Related Social Research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. "I'm not a graduate or doctor, yet we are all together:" articulating a partnership model for community-engaged research.Frontiers in public health · 2026
   Article
2. Community-Partnered Research appraisal tool for conducting, reporting and assessing community-based research.BMJ open · 2024
   Review
3. Design Thinking for Health Disparities and Interdisciplinary Knowledge Translation: An LGBTQ+ Youth Health Literacy Project.Health & social work · 2023
   Article
4. Using Citizen Science to Explore Neighbourhood Influences on Ageing Well: Pilot Project.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research.2019

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as