ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2019
Co-Production: An Ethical Model for Mental Health Research?
Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Let's Co! The how-to of working within a co-production framework to devise, design and execute collaborative multisite clinical trials.The British journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
- Gamified Assessment of Cognitive Impulsivity in Eating Disorders and Mental Ill-Health: Mixed Methods Study Incorporating Lived Experience Co-Design and Evaluation.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co-Production Panel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study of the Lived Experience of Children with ADHD.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improving shared decision-making in bronchiectasis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Review
- Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- The politicizing clinic: insights on 'the social' for mental health policy and practice.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024Article
- Youth partnership in suicide prevention research: moving beyond the safety discourse.BMJ open · 2023Review
- Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Determining stakeholder priorities and core components for school-based identification of mental health difficulties: A Delphi study.Journal of school psychology · 2022Article
- Supporting care home residents in the last year of life through 'Needs Rounds': Development of a pre-implementation programme theory through a rapid collaborative online approach.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- Virtual Community Engagement Studio (V-CES): Engaging Mothers With Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions in Research.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31544640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.