ArticleJournal of neurogenetics2019
Heritable natural variation of light/dark preference in an outbred zebrafish population.
Article in Journal of neurogenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing the adult zebrafish model of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of dynamic changes in behavior and physiology post-MPTP administration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Genome wide transcriptional changes underlie gradual and recurrent adaptation to protein malnutrition in zebrafish.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Employing zebrafish to understand genetic drivers of epilepsy-related comorbid behaviors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Larval zebrafish display dynamic learning of aversive stimuli in a constant visual surrounding.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety is a fear-like response to stimuli perceived to be threatening. Excessive or uncontrollable anxiety is a debilitating psychiatric disorder which affects many people throughout their lifetime. In unravelling the complex genetic and environmental regulations of anxiety-like phenotypes, models measuring the natural dark avoidance of larval zebrafish have shed light on the individual variation and heritability of this anxiety-related trait. Using the light/dark choice paradigm and selective breeding, this study aims to validate previous findings of the variable (VDA) and strong dark aversion (SDA) heritability in AB-WT larval zebrafish using the outbred zebrafish strain EK, which offers more genetic diversity to aid in future molecular mapping efforts. 190 larvae (6 days post fertilization [dpf] and 7 dpf) were tested across four trials and divided into variable (VDA), medium (MDA) and strong (SDA) dark aversion for further in-crosses. VDA and MDA larvae became more explorative with time, whereas SDA larvae rarely left the preferred light zone. The SDA and VDA in-crosses significantly increased the respective phenotypes in the second generation of larvae, whereas VDA × MDA inter-crosses did not. For the second-generation SDA cohort, dark aversion correlated with increased thigmotaxis, which reinforces SDA as an anxiety-like phenotype. Our finding that the dark aversion trait and SDA and VDA phenotypes are heritable in an outbred zebrafish population lays an important foundation for future studies of genetic underpinnings using whole-genome mapping methods. This conserved fear/anxiety-like response in a highly accessible model organism also allows for further pharmacological and behavioral studies to elucidate the etiology of anxiety and the search for novel therapeutics for anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.