Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31544440›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2019

[Application of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric hip fractures].

Chaoqun Wang, Yunhe Chang, Yang Zheng, Zhiqian Wang, Yujia Li, Yajing Yang, Qingxian Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chaoqun WangDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.
Yunhe ChangDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.
Yang ZhengDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.
Zhiqian WangDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.
Yujia LiDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.
Yajing YangDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.
Qingxian WangDepartment of Geriatric Orthopedics, Traumatic Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Biomechancial Key Laboratory, Hebei Provincial Othopedic Institute, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050051, P.R.China.wqxwx1028@163.com.
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.

methodsThe clinical data of 489 geriatric patients with hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) between January 1st 2016 and January 1st 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 279 patients were treated with the multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration care (observation group) and 210 patients were treated with the conventional therapeutics and nursing care (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type and classification of fracture, the interval between injury and admission, and Charlson index between the two groups (

resultsThe surgery rate was 90.32% (252/279) in observation group and 80.48% (169/210) in control group, showing significant difference between the two groups (

conclusionMultidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team is conducive not only to improve the surgery rates, but also to reduce perioperative complications as well as shorten the length of stay and preoperative waiting time.

Indexed as

Femoral Neck FracturesHip FracturesAgedHospitalizationHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomedoctor-nurse collaborationgeriatric hip fractureMultidisciplinary teamperioperative period

Identifiers

PMID31544440
PMCPMC8337637
OpenAlexW2995253425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.