ArticleCancer cytopathology2019
HER2 assessment by bright-field dual in situ hybridization in cell blocks of recurrent and metastatic breast carcinoma.
Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer recurrences or metastases often are diagnosed using cytology material. Cell blocks (CBs) with adequate cellularity are crucial for the determination of accurate hormonal and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and to guide treatment. In the current study, the authors evaluated the concordance of HER2 status between bright-field dual in situ hybridization (DISH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed on formalin-fixed CBs of recurrent and metastatic breast cancers.
methodsThe authors searched for patients who had breast carcinoma recurrences or metastases diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 by fine-needle aspiration or by the drainage of body cavity fluids with HER2 IHC and/or FISH performed on formalin-fixed CBs. Cases with adequate tumor cellularity (>50 cells) were selected. HER2 DISH was performed on all CBs. HER2 status of the primary breast carcinoma was recorded.
resultsFormalin-fixed CBs were identified from 30 patients with breast cancer recurrences and metastases in axillary lymph nodes (LNs) (5 patients), mediastinal LNs (8 patients), internal mammary LNs (1 patient), supraclavicular LNs (2 patients), portocaval LNs (1 patient), chest wall (3 patients), pleural fluid (3 patients), bone (4 patients), liver (2 patients), and lung (1 patient). All cases had HER2 IHC performed at the study institution and were scored by breast pathologists according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. The HER2 DISH results demonstrated 100% concordance (30 of 30 cases) with the concurrent IHC and/or FISH.
conclusionsAll methods of HER2 evaluation were found to accurately identify the amplification status. DISH can be used in tandem with IHC as a reflex assay instead of FISH and is an efficient and reliable method with which to determine HER2 amplification in formalin-fixed CBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.