ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Field drift correction of proton resonance frequency shift temperature mapping with multichannel fast alternating nonselective free induction decay readouts.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Straightforward Magnetic Resonance Temperature Measurements Combined with High Frame Rate and Magnetic Susceptibility Correction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A k-space-based method to measure and correct for temporal BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia.Cancers · 2020Review
- Correction of motion-induced susceptibility artifacts and BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Contactless Thermometry by MRI and MRS: Advanced Methods for Thermotherapy and Biomaterials.iScience · 2020Review
- Field drift correction of proton resonance frequency shift temperature mapping with multichannel fast alternating nonselective free induction decay readouts.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Magnetic Resonance Thermometry of Focused Ultrasound Using a Preclinical Focused Ultrasound Robotic System at 3T.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate that proton resonance frequency shift MR thermometry (PRFS-MRT) acquisition with nonselective free induction decay (FID), combined with coil sensitivity profiles, allows spatially resolved B
methodsPhantom experiments were performed at 1.5T and 3T. Acquisition of PRFS-MRT and FID were performed during MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound heating. The phase of the FIDs was used to estimate the change in angular frequency δω
resultsIn 30 minutes, B
conclusionFID phase information from individual receive coil elements allows spatially resolved B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.