Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31544224›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2019

Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes: a Review of the Evidence.

Mohammed E Al-Sofiani, Robert Derenbecker, Michael Quartuccio, Rita R Kalyani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. HFrontiers in chemistry · 2023
    Review
  3. Perioperative Management of a Patient With Cushing Disease.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed E Al-SofianiDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 333, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Robert DerenbeckerGeneral Internal Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael QuartuccioDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 333, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Rita R KalyaniDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 333, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. rrastogi@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USKing Saud University · SA

Funding

Lean Body Mass and the Development of DiabetesR03DK109163 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KALYANI, RITA R · 2016 to 2017
$174k
NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK109163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPeople with diabetes are at a higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared with those without diabetes. Though aspirin has been shown to have an overall net clinical benefit when used for secondary prevention of ASCVD in people with and without diabetes, the evidence for primary prevention, especially in those with diabetes, remains inconsistent. In this article, we review the latest studies examining the risks and benefits of aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD in adults with diabetes, discuss key aspects in assessing the risk-benefit ratio of aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD, and summarize current guidelines from professional societies on aspirin use for primary prevention in adults with diabetes. RECENT

findingsIn the general population, past studies have shown no difference in the beneficial effect of aspirin for primary cardiovascular disease prevention by diabetes status. However, several randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses in adults with diabetes have shown lack of net clinical benefit of aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD. The recent ASCEND trial documented cardiovascular benefit of aspirin for primary prevention in adults with diabetes but suggested that the increased risk of bleeding may outweigh the cardiovascular benefit. The decision to initiate aspirin for primary prevention of ASCVD must be considered carefully on an individual basis to balance the cardiovascular benefit and bleeding risk in all patients, especially those with diabetes. A multifactorial approach that focuses on managing ASCVD risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, and smoking is recommended in all patients. More research is needed to identify subgroups of people with diabetes who are more likely to benefit from aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD and develop better antithrombotic strategies that shift the risk-benefit balance toward an overall net clinical benefit.

Indexed as

AspirinCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsHumansPrimary PreventionRisk AssessmentAspirinCardiovascular AgentsAspirinAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseDiabetesPrimary cardiovascular prevention

Identifiers

PMID31544224
OpenAlexW2976695148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.