SynthesisGMS journal for medical education2019
Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education - does it work?
Synthesis in GMS journal for medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on the social platform "X" on physiotherapists' professional development and knowledge acquisition: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Observational
- 10 tips for clinical educators in designing and delivering learning experiences to improve clinical reasoning for medical students.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2025Article
- Effect of Interprofessional Clinical Debates on Attitudes of Interprofessional Teams.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2021Article
- Use of Debate as a Pedagogical Tool in Psychiatry Residency Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
- Critical Psychiatry Debates; A Neglected Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2021Article
- Classroom Debate as a Pedagogical Method to Explore the Relationship Between the Medical System and Patient Community Members.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.