Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31543993›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Intestinal antibody responses to a live oral poliovirus vaccine challenge among adults previously immunized with inactivated polio vaccine in Sweden.

Elizabeth B Brickley, Ruth I Connor, Wendy F Wieland-Alter, Marc S Collett, Marianne Hartford, Harrie Van Der Avoort, Austin W Boesch, Joshua A Weiner, Margaret E Ackerman, Mark A McKinlay and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Mucosal immunity to poliovirus.Mucosal immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Elizabeth B BrickleyInfectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-2288
Ruth I ConnorPediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Wendy F Wieland-AlterPediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Marc S CollettViroDefense Inc, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA.
Marianne HartfordClinical Trial Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.
Harrie Van Der AvoortCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Austin W BoeschThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Joshua A WeinerThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Margaret E AckermanThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Mark A McKinlayTask Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Minetaro AritaDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ananda S BandyopadhyayBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
John F ModlinBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Peter F WrightPediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Dartmouth College · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USGates Foundation · USNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEThe Task Force for Global Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur understanding of the acquisition of intestinal mucosal immunity and the control of poliovirus replication and transmission in later life is still emerging.

methodsAs part of a 2011 randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the experimental antiviral agent pocapavir (EudraCT 2011-004804-38), Swedish adults, aged 18-50 years, who had previously received four doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in childhood were challenged with a single dose of monovalent oral polio vaccine type 1 (mOPV1). Using faecal samples collected before and serially, over the course of 45 days, after mOPV1 challenge from a subset of placebo-arm participants who did not receive pocapavir (N=12), we investigated the kinetics of the intestinal antibody response to challenge virus by measuring poliovirus type 1-specific neutralising activity and IgA concentrations.

resultsIn faecal samples collected prior to mOPV1 challenge, we found no evidence of pre-existing intestinal neutralising antibodies to any of the three poliovirus serotypes. Despite persistent high-titered vaccine virus shedding and rising serum neutralisation responses after mOPV1 challenge, intestinal poliovirus type 1-specific neutralisation remained low with a titer of ≤18.4 across all time points and individuals. Poliovirus types 1-specific, 2-specific and 3-specific IgA remained below the limit of detection for all specimens collected postchallenge.

interpretationIn contrast to recent studies demonstrating brisk intestinal antibody responses to oral polio vaccine challenge in young children previously vaccinated with IPV, this investigation finds that adults previously vaccinated with IPV have only modest intestinal poliovirus type 1-specific neutralisation and no IgA responses that are measurable in stool samples following documented mOPV1 infection.

Indexed as

clinical trialimmunisationpoliomyelitisvaccines

Identifiers

PMID31543993
PMCPMC6730592
OpenAlexW2970335474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.