Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31543729›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2019

Intergenerational programs: What can school-age children and older people expect from them? A systematic review.

Caroline Giraudeau, Nathalie Bailly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Benefits of Intergenerational Wisdom-Sharing: A Randomized Controlled Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding Intergenerational Interactions Between Older Adults and Children: Expert Opinions About the Roles of Community Environments.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient and Public Involvement in Action: Shaping an Intergenerational Engagement Intervention in a Long-Term Care Facility in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline GiraudeauLaboratoire Psychologie des Ages de la Vie et Adaptation (PAVeA), Université de Tours, 3, rue des tanneurs, B.P.4103, 37041 Tours Cedex 1, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9010-4134
Nathalie BaillyLaboratoire Psychologie des Ages de la Vie et Adaptation (PAVeA), Université de Tours, 3, rue des tanneurs, B.P.4103, 37041 Tours Cedex 1, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, there has been a growing trend for intergenerational initiatives worldwide. Intergenerational programs (IGPs) aim to facilitate cooperation and exchange among different age groups. While most studies highlight the benefits for each generation, the programs and study designs vary widely. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature between 2005 and 2015 to: (1) characterize and define the IGPs studied and (2) identify the benefits for school-age children and older people aged 60 years or over. First, 53 articles with defined keywords were collected from online databases. Then, using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 articles were selected. These were classified according to methodological quality and were analyzed one by one. The content of the programs varied: three involved artistic activities, three educational activities, one health, three open-ended activities, and one was organized around a citizen's project. Concerning the benefits of IGPs for children and older adults, some studies highlighted significant differences in positive attitudes, behaviors, confidence, and competence for the children, and significant differences in mental and physical health, and quality of life for older adults. However, it should be noted that those benefits are not systematic. Our findings are discussed in the light of the meaningfulness of the activities and the role of IGPs, organization of the program, and participants' knowledge of the other generation. Future studies may wish to consider searching for additional variables to further refine our understanding of the benefits for participants.

Indexed as

BenefitsChildrenIntergenerational programsOlder adultsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31543729
PMCPMC6728408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.