Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542885›Full record

ArticleAmbio2019

Visualization-supported dialogues in the Baltic Sea Region.

Tina-Simone Neset, Julie Wilk, Carlo Navarra, René Capell, Alena Bartosova

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina-Simone NesetDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden. tina.neset@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-9943
Julie WilkDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Carlo NavarraDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
René CapellSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), 60176, Norrköping, Sweden.
Alena BartosovaSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), 60176, Norrköping, Sweden.

Funding

BONUS 2014-73
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores visualization-supported dialogues with water management and ecosystem stakeholders from four catchments in Sweden, Latvia, Germany and Poland. An interactive visualization tool was designed to present information regarding modelled effects of chosen future pathways including different measures that address ecosystem issues under present and future scenarios of land use and climate change, and estimated benefits and costs of the measures. This paper assesses if and how visualization-supported dialogues hinder or support key components of good governance of water and ecosystem management among expert stakeholders. We discuss challenges and opportunities related to the tool and dialogue design, and performance of dialogues. Results from a cross-case workshop indicate that the form and functionality of the tool contributes to participation, empowerment, accessibility and flexibility, while dialogue design is instrumental for encouraging trust and inclusion of local knowledge and competence.

Indexed as

EcosystemBaltic StatesGermanyLatviaPolandSwedenBONUS MIRACLEGeographic visualizationGood governanceParticipatory processesStakeholder dialogues

Identifiers

PMID31542885
PMCPMC6814638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.