Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542876›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Research-based PAM50 signature and long-term breast cancer survival.

Minya Pu, Karen Messer, Sherri R Davies, Tammi L Vickery, Emily Pittman, Barbara A Parker, Matthew J Ellis, Shirley W Flatt, Catherine R Marinac, Sandahl H Nelson and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. NMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. High Expression ofCancer genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Minya PuMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Karen MesserDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0901, USA.
Sherri R DaviesDepartment of Medicine, Washington University St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tammi L VickeryWashington University St. Louis, McDonnell Genome Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Emily PittmanMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Barbara A ParkerDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Matthew J EllisBaylor College of Medicine, Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shirley W FlattMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Catherine R MarinacDivision of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sandahl H NelsonPrecision for Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Elaine R MardisNationwide Children's Hospital, Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
John P PierceDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0901, USA.
Loki NatarajanDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0901, USA. LNatarajan@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-828X
University of California San Diego · USBaylor College of Medicine · USHarvard University · USJames S. McDonnell Foundation · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USPrecision for Medicine (United States) · USUC San Diego Health System · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Genomic, clinical and behavioral signature of long-term breast cancer survivalR01CA166293 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MESSER, KAREN, NATARAJAN, LOKI · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
Obesity, Molecular Biomarkers, and Multiple Myeloma PrognosisF32CA220859 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MARINAC, CATHERINE · 2018 to 2019
$94k
National Cancer Institute (US) F32CA220859National Cancer Institute (US) P30CA023100National Cancer Institute (US) R01CA166293NCI NIH HHS F32 CA220859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMulti-gene signatures provide biological insight and risk stratification in breast cancer. Intrinsic molecular subtypes defined by mRNA expression of 50 genes (PAM50) are prognostic in hormone-receptor positive postmenopausal breast cancer. Yet, for 25-40% in the PAM50 intermediate risk group, long-term risk remains uncertain. Our study aimed to (i) test the long-term prognostic value of the PAM50 signature in pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer; (ii) investigate if the PAM50 model could be improved by addition of other mRNAs implicated in oncogenesis.

methodsWe used archived FFPE samples from 1723 breast cancer survivors; high quality reads were obtained on 1253 samples. Transcript expression was quantified using a custom codeset with probes for > 100 targets. Cox models assessed gene signatures for breast cancer relapse and survival.

resultsOver 15 + years of follow-up, PAM50 subtypes were (P < 0.01) associated with breast cancer outcomes after accounting for tumor stage, grade and age at diagnosis. Results did not differ by menopausal status at diagnosis. Women with Luminal B (versus Luminal A) subtype had a > 60% higher hazard. Addition of a 13-gene hypoxia signature improved prognostication with > 40% higher hazard in the highest vs lowest hypoxia tertiles.

conclusionsPAM50 intrinsic subtypes were independently prognostic for long-term breast cancer survival, irrespective of menopausal status. Addition of hypoxia signatures improved risk prediction. If replicated, incorporating the 13-gene hypoxia signature into the existing PAM50 risk assessment tool, may refine risk stratification and further clarify treatment for breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCell HypoxiaFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerGene signaturesHypoxiaLong-term survivalPAM50 subtypesPrognostic modeling

Identifiers

PMID31542876
PMCPMC6985186
OpenAlexW2974120029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.