Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542847›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOX) as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (CORONA II).

Norifumi Hattori, Goro Nakayama, Keisuke Uehara, Toshisada Aiba, Kiyoshi Ishigure, Eiji Sakamoto, Yuichiro Tojima, Mitsuro Kanda, Daisuke Kobayashi, Chie Tanaka and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Norifumi HattoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan. norifumi@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-7208
Goro NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Keisuke UeharaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshisada AibaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kiyoshi IshigureDepartment of Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.
Eiji SakamotoDepartment of Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuichiro TojimaDepartment of Surgery, Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Mitsuro KandaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Daisuke KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Chie TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Suguru YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Masahiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Michitaka FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Masato NaginoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis multicenter, single-arm phase II study (UMIN000008429) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsPatients with resectable clinical Stage II or III rectal cancer were enrolled to receive eight cycles of CapOX therapy (130 mg/m

resultsA total of 40 patients (Stage II, 21; Stage III, 19) were enrolled between September 2012 and November 2015 from seven institutions. Thirty-nine patients (97%) received R0 resection, and 32 patients (84%) received postoperative CapOX therapy. The completion rate of all eight cycles of CapOX therapy was 66%. Relative dose intensities were 87% for oxaliplatin and 84% for capecitabine. At a median follow-up period of 46 months, disease recurrence was observed in nine patients, including three with local recurrence. Three-year RFS and OS rates were 75% (95% CI 57-86%) and 96% (95% CI 80-99%), respectively. Frequencies of Grade ≥ 3 hematological and non-hematologic adverse events were 19% and 38%, respectively.

conclusionCapOX therapy is feasible as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOxaliplatinRectal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeCapecitabineOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID31542847
PMCPMC6946745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.